Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
EMBO Rep ; 25(4): 1835-1858, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429578

ABSTRACT

Cancer cachexia is a tumour-induced wasting syndrome, characterised by extreme loss of skeletal muscle. Defective mitochondria can contribute to muscle wasting; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Using a Drosophila larval model of cancer cachexia, we observed enlarged and dysfunctional muscle mitochondria. Morphological changes were accompanied by upregulation of beta-oxidation proteins and depletion of muscle glycogen and lipid stores. Muscle lipid stores were also decreased in Colon-26 adenocarcinoma mouse muscle samples, and expression of the beta-oxidation gene CPT1A was negatively associated with muscle quality in cachectic patients. Mechanistically, mitochondrial defects result from reduced muscle insulin signalling, downstream of tumour-secreted insulin growth factor binding protein (IGFBP) homologue ImpL2. Strikingly, muscle-specific inhibition of Forkhead box O (FOXO), mitochondrial fusion, or beta-oxidation in tumour-bearing animals preserved muscle integrity. Finally, dietary supplementation with nicotinamide or lipids, improved muscle health in tumour-bearing animals. Overall, our work demonstrates that muscle FOXO, mitochondria dynamics/beta-oxidation and lipid utilisation are key regulators of muscle wasting in cancer cachexia.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Drosophila Proteins , Insulins , Mice , Animals , Humans , Cachexia/etiology , Cachexia/metabolism , Drosophila/metabolism , Mitochondrial Dynamics , Muscular Atrophy/pathology , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Colonic Neoplasms/metabolism , Insulins/metabolism , Lipids , Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism
2.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(6): e0009521, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34129602

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cholera, an acute diarrheal disease is a major public health problem in many developing countries. Several rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) are available for the detection of cholera, but their efficacies are not compared in an endemic setting. In this study, we have compared the specificity and sensitivity of three RDT kits for the detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 and compared their efficiency with culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. METHODS: Five hundred six diarrheal stool samples collected from patients from two different hospitals in Kolkata, India were tested using SD Bioline Cholera, SMART-II Cholera O1 and Crystal-VC RDT kits. All the stool samples were screened for the presence of V. cholerae by direct and enrichment culture methods. Stool DNA-based PCR assay was made to target the cholera toxin (ctxAB) and O1 somatic antigen (rfb) encoding genes. Statistical evaluation of the RDTs has been made using STATA software with stool culture and PCR results as the gold standards. The Bayesian latent class model (LCM) was used to evaluate the diagnostic tests in the absence of the gold standard. RESULTS: Involving culture technique as gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the cholera RDT kits in the direct testing of stools was highest with SAMRT-II (86.1%) and SD-Cholera (94.4%), respectively. The DNA based PCR assays gave very high sensitivity (98.4%) but the specificity was comparatively low (75.3%). After enrichment, the high sensitivity and specificity was detected with SAMRT-II (78.8%) and SD-Cholera (99.1%), respectively. Considering PCR as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the RDTs remained between 52.3-58.2% and 92.3-96.8%, respectively. In the LCM, the sensitivity of direct and enrichment testing was high in SAMRT-II (88% and 92%, respectively), but the specificity was high in SD cholera for both the methods (97% and 100%, respectively). The sensitivity/specificity of RDTs and direct culture have also been analyzed considering the age, gender and diarrheal disease severity of the patients. CONCLUSION: Overall, the performance of the RDT kits remained almost similar in terms of specificity and sensitivity. Performance of PCR was superior to the antibody-based RDTs. The RTDs are very useful in identifying cholera cases during outbreak/epidemic situations and for making them as a point-of-care (POC) testing tool needs more improvement.


Subject(s)
Cholera/diagnosis , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Vibrio cholerae O1/isolation & purification , Antigens, Bacterial/genetics , Cholera Toxin/genetics , Diarrhea/microbiology , Humans , India , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vibrio cholerae O1/genetics , Vibrio cholerae O1/immunology
3.
J Biosci ; 44(5)2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31719222

ABSTRACT

Trillions of microbes living in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of the human body finely tune homeostatic equilibrium in the GIT ecosystem and encode key functionalities that play crucial role in host metabolic functions, synthesis of macro- and micronutrients, xenobiotics metabolisms, development of innate and adaptive immune systems, tissue and organ developments and resistance against invasion of enteric pathogens. The microbial diversity and richness of GIT ecosystem varies greatly between individuals and over time. Extent of taxonomic and functional variations in GIT ecosystem is linked with dietary habit, pharmaceuticals usages, age, sex, body mass index, ethnicity, geography, altitude and civilization. Understanding a holistic picture of GIT microbiome of healthy people living across geography and identifying population specific 'keystone' taxa is of immense importance for identifying microbial species that may provide protection against chronic and metabolic diseases. Knowledge on geographic or ethnicity specific microbial signatures may also help us to understand the varied efficacy of different drugs and vaccines in different population. India is the home of more than 1.36 billion people belonging to 2000 human communities residing in well distinct geography. In the present review, we discuss the microbial signatures in health and diseases of the rural and urban Indians living in sea level and high altitude areas.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Ecosystem , Humans , India , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Species Specificity , Vaccines
4.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 116(13): 6226-6231, 2019 03 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30867296

ABSTRACT

The Bay of Bengal is known as the epicenter for seeding several devastating cholera outbreaks across the globe. Vibrio cholerae, the etiological agent of cholera, has extraordinary competency to acquire exogenous DNA by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and adapt them into its genome for structuring metabolic processes, developing drug resistance, and colonizing the human intestine. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in V. cholerae has become a global concern. However, little is known about the identity of the resistance traits, source of AMR genes, acquisition process, and stability of the genetic elements linked with resistance genes in V. cholerae Here we present details of AMR profiles of 443 V. cholerae strains isolated from the stool samples of diarrheal patients from two regions of India. We sequenced the whole genome of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) V. cholerae to identify AMR genes and genomic elements that harbor the resistance traits. Our genomic findings were further confirmed by proteome analysis. We also engineered the genome of V. cholerae to monitor the importance of the autonomously replicating plasmid and core genome in the resistance profile. Our findings provided insights into the genomes of recent cholera isolates and identified several acquired traits including plasmids, transposons, integrative conjugative elements (ICEs), pathogenicity islands (PIs), prophages, and gene cassettes that confer fitness to the pathogen. The knowledge generated from this study would help in better understanding of V. cholerae evolution and management of cholera disease by providing clinical guidance on preferred treatment regimens.


Subject(s)
Cholera/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Gene Transfer, Horizontal , Genome, Bacterial/genetics , Vibrio cholerae/genetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Conjugation, Genetic/genetics , DNA Transposable Elements/genetics , Diarrhea/microbiology , Evolution, Molecular , Feces/microbiology , Genetic Variation , Genomic Islands/genetics , Humans , Imipenem/pharmacology , India , Interspersed Repetitive Sequences/genetics , Phenotype , Plasmids/genetics , Prophages/genetics , Proteome , Vibrio cholerae/drug effects , Vibrio cholerae/isolation & purification , Vibrio cholerae/pathogenicity , Vibrio cholerae O1/genetics , Vibrio cholerae O1/isolation & purification , Vibrio cholerae O1/pathogenicity , Whole Genome Sequencing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...